<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GTD is Broken &#8211; Focus on Results, Not the System</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/2007/07/02/gtd-is-broken-focus-on-results-not-the-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/2007/07/02/gtd-is-broken-focus-on-results-not-the-system/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:53:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ask The Readers: Can GTD Be Simplified? - Practical advice on personal development, productivity and GTD</title>
		<link>http://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/2007/07/02/gtd-is-broken-focus-on-results-not-the-system/comment-page-1/#comment-186779</link>
		<dc:creator>Ask The Readers: Can GTD Be Simplified? - Practical advice on personal development, productivity and GTD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 09:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/2007/07/02/gtd-is-broken-focus-on-results-not-the-system/#comment-186779</guid>
		<description>[...] implementing it into their workflow. There are a number of examples out there of how GTD has been simplified (Zen To Done being a prime one). However do such approaches really simplify the system or do they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] implementing it into their workflow. There are a number of examples out there of how GTD has been simplified (Zen To Done being a prime one). However do such approaches really simplify the system or do they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanGTD</title>
		<link>http://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/2007/07/02/gtd-is-broken-focus-on-results-not-the-system/comment-page-1/#comment-184062</link>
		<dc:creator>DanGTD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 09:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/2007/07/02/gtd-is-broken-focus-on-results-not-the-system/#comment-184062</guid>
		<description>I devised an approach at http://www.gtdagenda.com, and you are welcome to use the application.

You first need to set Goals in each of your life categories. Although David doesn’t call them categories and goals, but “levels of focus, altitude views, areas of responsability etc”, it’s the same thing.

Then you create Projects in each goal, these being sub-goals that when completed move you forward to the completion of the goal.

Then you have Tasks, actionable steps in each project. Here you can set the famous Next Actions, and also associate the tasks to your Contexts.

Checklists section is great for your repetitive tasks (daily, weekly, monthly or yearly). It generates a series of checkboxes and you check them off as you do the tasks.

Schedules are for the scheduled blocks of time. Even if GTD does not promote scheduling we all have schedules (at work, at school, self-imposed etc). The activities here can be associated with the existing projects.

Calendar section is for events that need to be done at exactly a specific date.

Dan,
http://www.gtdagenda.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I devised an approach at <a href="http://www.gtdagenda.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.gtdagenda.com</a>, and you are welcome to use the application.</p>
<p>You first need to set Goals in each of your life categories. Although David doesn’t call them categories and goals, but “levels of focus, altitude views, areas of responsability etc”, it’s the same thing.</p>
<p>Then you create Projects in each goal, these being sub-goals that when completed move you forward to the completion of the goal.</p>
<p>Then you have Tasks, actionable steps in each project. Here you can set the famous Next Actions, and also associate the tasks to your Contexts.</p>
<p>Checklists section is great for your repetitive tasks (daily, weekly, monthly or yearly). It generates a series of checkboxes and you check them off as you do the tasks.</p>
<p>Schedules are for the scheduled blocks of time. Even if GTD does not promote scheduling we all have schedules (at work, at school, self-imposed etc). The activities here can be associated with the existing projects.</p>
<p>Calendar section is for events that need to be done at exactly a specific date.</p>
<p>Dan,<br />
<a href="http://www.gtdagenda.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.gtdagenda.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Young</title>
		<link>http://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/2007/07/02/gtd-is-broken-focus-on-results-not-the-system/comment-page-1/#comment-69813</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/2007/07/02/gtd-is-broken-focus-on-results-not-the-system/#comment-69813</guid>
		<description>Son,

By studying I don&#039;t mean avoiding reading the material in the first place.  No matter how good I am, I still must do that.  What I am referring to is the constant re-reading of material.

-Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Son,</p>
<p>By studying I don&#8217;t mean avoiding reading the material in the first place.  No matter how good I am, I still must do that.  What I am referring to is the constant re-reading of material.</p>
<p>-Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: son</title>
		<link>http://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/2007/07/02/gtd-is-broken-focus-on-results-not-the-system/comment-page-1/#comment-69611</link>
		<dc:creator>son</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/2007/07/02/gtd-is-broken-focus-on-results-not-the-system/#comment-69611</guid>
		<description>how do you ace a history final without studying? 

you associate the things in a web that somehow relates to the material...what about the actualy reading? I am reading psychology right now for example...and I am not &#039;connecting&#039;...am I supposed to connect as I go?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how do you ace a history final without studying? </p>
<p>you associate the things in a web that somehow relates to the material&#8230;what about the actualy reading? I am reading psychology right now for example&#8230;and I am not &#8216;connecting&#8217;&#8230;am I supposed to connect as I go?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L&#8217;ossessione dell&#8217;organizzazione &#171; La Via SenzaNome</title>
		<link>http://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/2007/07/02/gtd-is-broken-focus-on-results-not-the-system/comment-page-1/#comment-41717</link>
		<dc:creator>L&#8217;ossessione dell&#8217;organizzazione &#171; La Via SenzaNome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/2007/07/02/gtd-is-broken-focus-on-results-not-the-system/#comment-41717</guid>
		<description>[...] Ago 16th, 2007 by viasenzanome    Una riflessione sui sistemi di organizzazione. Ne esistono molti, ed il più famoso è senz&#8217;altro il GTD di Dave Allens. In rete è possibile trovare un gran numero di entusiasti che lo utilizzano e persino alcuni che vi hanno dedicato interi blog. Ma siamo davvero sicuri dell&#8217;utilità di questi sistemi? Non è che forse ci si sta ancora una volta fossilizzando sui mezzi invece che sullo scopo? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ago 16th, 2007 by viasenzanome    Una riflessione sui sistemi di organizzazione. Ne esistono molti, ed il più famoso è senz&#8217;altro il GTD di Dave Allens. In rete è possibile trovare un gran numero di entusiasti che lo utilizzano e persino alcuni che vi hanno dedicato interi blog. Ma siamo davvero sicuri dell&#8217;utilità di questi sistemi? Non è che forse ci si sta ancora una volta fossilizzando sui mezzi invece che sullo scopo? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Overholt</title>
		<link>http://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/2007/07/02/gtd-is-broken-focus-on-results-not-the-system/comment-page-1/#comment-33549</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Overholt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 06:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/2007/07/02/gtd-is-broken-focus-on-results-not-the-system/#comment-33549</guid>
		<description>For those who are already fully organized and even optimized, they probably don&#039;t need something like GTD.  However, there are those like myself that have tried different things over the years, with little success.  I read GTD thru quickly once, and set it up somewhat like he advised. I quickly slipped back into my old ways.

After a second read, a slow read, with pen and highlighters, it made sense.  I did modify it, but not much.  My productivity is now beginning to soar.  

For those who struggle to keep up, and still fall behind, I say give it a good shot.  Once it starts becoming a habit (like excercise did for me two years ago), you&#039;ll  be glad you invested the time.  The payoff for me has been great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those who are already fully organized and even optimized, they probably don&#8217;t need something like GTD.  However, there are those like myself that have tried different things over the years, with little success.  I read GTD thru quickly once, and set it up somewhat like he advised. I quickly slipped back into my old ways.</p>
<p>After a second read, a slow read, with pen and highlighters, it made sense.  I did modify it, but not much.  My productivity is now beginning to soar.  </p>
<p>For those who struggle to keep up, and still fall behind, I say give it a good shot.  Once it starts becoming a habit (like excercise did for me two years ago), you&#8217;ll  be glad you invested the time.  The payoff for me has been great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dispatches from TJICistan &#187; Blog Archive &#187; apply the 80/20 rule to GTD</title>
		<link>http://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/2007/07/02/gtd-is-broken-focus-on-results-not-the-system/comment-page-1/#comment-29490</link>
		<dc:creator>dispatches from TJICistan &#187; Blog Archive &#187; apply the 80/20 rule to GTD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 03:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/2007/07/02/gtd-is-broken-focus-on-results-not-the-system/#comment-29490</guid>
		<description>[...] Scott Young feels the same way. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Scott Young feels the same way. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Young</title>
		<link>http://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/2007/07/02/gtd-is-broken-focus-on-results-not-the-system/comment-page-1/#comment-29475</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 00:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/2007/07/02/gtd-is-broken-focus-on-results-not-the-system/#comment-29475</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the thoughts everyone.

I suppose optimization will be endless.  My issue is that people spend a lot of time thinking about how to optimize a system that should be as simple as possible.

Perhaps it&#039;s a function of my personality as well.  I lean more towards the kind of higher level ideas broken down into practical solutions by people like Steve Pavlina, Tim Ferriss and Leo Babauta.

-Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the thoughts everyone.</p>
<p>I suppose optimization will be endless.  My issue is that people spend a lot of time thinking about how to optimize a system that should be as simple as possible.</p>
<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s a function of my personality as well.  I lean more towards the kind of higher level ideas broken down into practical solutions by people like Steve Pavlina, Tim Ferriss and Leo Babauta.</p>
<p>-Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZHereford</title>
		<link>http://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/2007/07/02/gtd-is-broken-focus-on-results-not-the-system/comment-page-1/#comment-29446</link>
		<dc:creator>ZHereford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 21:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/2007/07/02/gtd-is-broken-focus-on-results-not-the-system/#comment-29446</guid>
		<description>Finally! 

I was wondering with all the productivity articles being written and read all over the place - who&#039;s actually doing anything?

I like how you point out to focus on getting things done, not the system.

Good stuff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally! </p>
<p>I was wondering with all the productivity articles being written and read all over the place &#8211; who&#8217;s actually doing anything?</p>
<p>I like how you point out to focus on getting things done, not the system.</p>
<p>Good stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuri</title>
		<link>http://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/2007/07/02/gtd-is-broken-focus-on-results-not-the-system/comment-page-1/#comment-29441</link>
		<dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 20:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/2007/07/02/gtd-is-broken-focus-on-results-not-the-system/#comment-29441</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s never ending process - you keep enhancing the system you use indefinitely. I don&#039;t know many people who would use GTD in &quot;pure form&quot;. Most of them, including me, simplify it to the level we are comfortable with. I don&#039;t use 43 folders system, yet I use &quot;next action&quot; approach in my every task. I try not to focus so much on the system but rather focus on particular results I can get from using part of the system here and now. In fact, I don&#039;t think David Allen was ever presenting GTD as &quot;complete system&quot; that will only function if you use every part of it. So my advice after all is in line with your post - focus on productivity and actual things done, not on system itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s never ending process &#8211; you keep enhancing the system you use indefinitely. I don&#8217;t know many people who would use GTD in &#8220;pure form&#8221;. Most of them, including me, simplify it to the level we are comfortable with. I don&#8217;t use 43 folders system, yet I use &#8220;next action&#8221; approach in my every task. I try not to focus so much on the system but rather focus on particular results I can get from using part of the system here and now. In fact, I don&#8217;t think David Allen was ever presenting GTD as &#8220;complete system&#8221; that will only function if you use every part of it. So my advice after all is in line with your post &#8211; focus on productivity and actual things done, not on system itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.512 seconds -->

