Technical skills are those aspects of creativity which don\u2019t actually require, well, creativity. Take my portrait drawing challenge<\/a> as an example. Although I\u2019m proud of what I was able to accomplish with one month\u2019s work, there was zero creativity involved. The difficulty in this challenge was purely technical.<\/p>\n Technical skill is the aspect of creative expertise most impressive to non-artists. Being able to play a very difficult guitar solo flawlessly or render a compelling likeness of an image with paint or pencil is hard to do. But, strictly speaking, there isn\u2019t much creativity required.<\/p>\n Ideational skills, in contrast, are more often what we refer to as creativity itself. What we think of as \u201ccreativity\u201d is the ability to do something that is both valuable and original. Among practitioners, there\u2019s usually a greater appreciation for these ideational skills, as technical skills often lose their aura of mysticism when you\u2019ve spent enough time practicing them.<\/p>\n Great artists are usually good at both the technical and ideational components of creative skills, although some artists\u2019s talents clearly lie more heavily on one side or the other. John Singer Sargent\u2019s paintings are technically virtuosic\u2014especially when you appreciate that most of his work was done alla prima<\/em>, which means he did each painting largely in one go, rather than meticulously building up layers as was more common during the Renaissance:<\/p>\n In contrast, Vincent van Gogh is the best paradigm of an ideational genius with mediocre technical skills. He couldn\u2019t keep up with the other artists in his Parisian atelier and eventually left. Even when he was in the mature phase of his painting, he frequently repeated the same subject multiple times because he struggled to get the details right:<\/p>\n Still, as much as I\u2019m personally a fan of Sargent\u2019s, it\u2019s clear that Van Gogh has had far more impact as a painter, in no small part due to his original and compelling style.<\/p>\n With this distinction in mind, let\u2019s look at how how to get good at each aspect of creative skills.<\/p>\n Technical proficiency is the easier of the two to master. It\u2019s hardly trivial, but technical skills are amenable to hard work and practice in a way that ideational genius often is not.<\/p>\n That being said, many people struggle to acquire technical proficiency in creative skills because they go about it the wrong way. All technical skills break down into three essential parts:<\/p>\n The first part is that to learn a creative skill you need to start with a method. This can be difficult because many artists have so overlearned their skills that they no longer appear to follow any particular method.<\/p>\n This was an aspect of portrait drawing that initially confounded me. Seeing street artists draw a good likeness in minutes or technically excellent artists render a likeness with a few flicks of their brush suggests that perhaps there isn\u2019t a method at all, that success in art is simply an innate talent or intuition.<\/p>\n But this misunderstands the situation. Across many domains, researchers have found that nearly all expertise follows a similar pattern. Skills start out learned explicitly but, after more and more practice, parts of that explicit learning become automated\u2014they become more like background intuition than a method you can easily articulate.<\/span>1<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n When I started my portrait drawing challenge, for instance, I didn\u2019t turn up very good methods. So I assumed that simply putting in a lot of bulk practice with feedback would be the key to improvement. I was right that high volumes of practice are essential, but I was wrong in assuming that methods were irrelevant.<\/p>\n \u2028The fact is, most portrait artists use a variety of methods to gain accuracy. Some of these are perceptual, using various means to overcome optical illusions or our natural sensory limitations to correctly assess the relative sizes, angles and tonal values in an image. Others are conceptual, building up from knowledge of lighting, geometry and anatomy to infer shapes that aren\u2019t immediately visible.<\/p>\n The starting point for learning any technical skill is first to learn what the methods used are, and then practice them until they become second nature.<\/p>\n The next part of technical proficiency is less about rote practice and more about creating a mental model of the possibilities afforded by the medium and the constraints attached. I love this little clip discussing how Steven Spielberg achieved a scene in the movie Hook<\/em> where one of the Lost Boys appears to bring down his sword quickly just a few millimeters from Robin Williams\u2019s head<\/a>.<\/p>\n In a pre-CGI world, Spielberg achieved this effect by filming the entire scene backwards, including the dialog of the actors, so that what appears to be a near-fatal sword strike is actually the sword lifting up quickly, in reverse.<\/p>\n The final key to technical virtuosity is an enormous amount of practice. Both precision and fluency matter here.<\/p>\n Precision, in the sense of adhering to accuracy afforded by the method you\u2019ve adopted, is necessary because it is how you learn the underlying skill. Thus, whether you\u2019re learning a method for drawing a portrait or playing a guitar solo, your practice will be ineffective if you permit yourself to make a ton of mistakes.<\/p>\n Fluency matters because motor skills, like the strumming of a guitar or the flicking of a paintbrush, will be completely different if they\u2019re executed with different rhythms or movements. \u2028\u2028I used to struggle with the tension between precision and fluency. In visual arts, there\u2019s often a contrast between \u201ctighter\u201d more controlled styles, and \u201clooser\u201d more expressive ones. Sometimes it feels like I need to slow down and get more precise to improve. Other times it feels like I\u2019d do better to just loosen up.\u2028\u2028 But I think this distinction is a bit of an illusion. Looser \u201cexpressive\u201d movements are simply a different kind of motor skill than tightly controlled ones. Both of these movements need practice to master, but that doesn\u2019t negate the need for broader technical proficiency. Like many skills in life, the solution is to practice both the movements and the methods that support them.<\/p>\n The other component of creative skills is having good, original ideas. Even this isn\u2019t entirely removed from technical proficiency. If you want to understand the opportunities for expressing good, original ideas within a medium, you first have to understand what the medium affords and what it constrains. Creativity, then, is at least somewhat reliant on proficiency.<\/p>\n But it\u2019s a mistake to simply collapse technical virtuosity down to creativity, because creativity relies on more than just being really good at the technical aspects of the craft.<\/p>\n Having really good, original ideas is a mixture of two different components:<\/p>\n Knowledge is the most important part. There\u2019s good evidence that creativity itself is a largely random process. What separates more creative artists from less creative ones is less the ability to generate lots of random ideas (all of us have that ability), but that the more creative artists have better quality filters and thus can judge more reliably which ideas are actually good.<\/p>\n Vincent van Gogh is a case in point. Although he struggled technically, he was incredibly attuned to the artistic landscape of his time. His brother was an art dealer, and Van Gogh had a lot of contact with the emerging trends in the art world. So, even though he is often billed as an \u201coutsider\u201d compared to his Salon-trained contemporaries, he had insider knowledge.<\/p>\n Similarly, of my friends who are successful serial authors, I\u2019m more impressed by their ability to quickly ascertain which ideas are likely to be popular and engaging than their writing skill.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Before-after-1024x576.png\")
<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/sargeant-portrait.jpg\")
<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/vangogh-portrait-917x1024.jpeg\")
<\/figure>\n<\/div>\nAchieving Technical Proficiency<\/h2>\n
\n
How to Have Better Ideas<\/h2>\n
\n