{"id":6712,"date":"2017-02-14T09:02:22","date_gmt":"2017-02-14T16:02:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/?p=6712"},"modified":"2018-03-29T12:59:19","modified_gmt":"2018-03-29T19:59:19","slug":"simple-models","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/2017\/02\/14\/simple-models\/","title":{"rendered":"Simplicity Beats Nuance: Why the Wrong Answer Can Often Beat the Correct One"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Nobody wants to be told their views are oversimplified. So, when thinking about issues, we tend to try to include as many factors as possible. The more nuanced our views become, the less likely they can be attacked for missing something important.<\/p>\n<p>But are more nuanced ways of thinking about a problem actually more useful?<\/p>\n<p>There\u2019s at least some evidence that simpler models are better than more nuanced ones. Consider the example from Daniel Kahneman\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Thinking-Fast-Slow-Daniel-Kahneman\/dp\/0374533555\/?&amp;_encoding=UTF8&amp;tag=scottcom-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;linkId=deb7e4160011471235538d3451e3f665&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325\" target=\"_blank\">Thinking, Fast and Slow<\/a><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;\" src=\"\/\/ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com\/e\/ir?t=scottcom-20&amp;l=ur2&amp;o=1\" alt=\"\" width=\"1\" height=\"1\" border=\"0\" \/> involving trained counselors trying to predict student grades after their freshman year:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cThe counselors interviewed each student for forty-five minutes. They also had access to high school grades, several aptitude tests, and a four-page personal statement. [A simpler model] used only a fraction of this information: high school grades and one aptitude test. Nevertheless [the model] was more accurate than 11 of the 14 counsellors.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>This result was far from unusual. Simple algorithms and models were often found to beat nuanced experts in a wide variety of professions from stock pickers to medical professionals.<\/p>\n<h2>The Problem with Nuance<\/h2>\n<p>Reality is complicated. It only seems natural that having models of reality that attempt to model this complexity are going to be more useful than simpler models.<\/p>\n<p>But there are two problems with trying to hold a more nuanced mental model than a simpler one: implementation and falsifiability.<\/p>\n<p>The problem of implementation is that if your model is more complicated it can be a lot harder to say exactly what should be done to fix a problem.<\/p>\n<p>Say you hold the (more nuanced) view that success in your career is a combination of aptitude, connections, credentials, politicking and economic forces. What does that mean you should do next? Unfortunately, with so many possibly relevant factors, it\u2019s very hard to say.<\/p>\n<p>Instead, if you held the (more simplified) view that success in your career depends on doing your job very well, you\u2019d have a much clearer picture of what needs to be done.<\/p>\n<p>This problem of implementation could be disregarded, however, if it weren\u2019t for another problem: falsifiability. Namely, more complex theories are harder to disprove because they explain a lot more. Unfortunately, explaining more is not a virtue. A theory that explains every possible occurrence tells you nothing.<\/p>\n<p>In our simplified career model, we could learn fairly easily when it wasn\u2019t a good model of our particular career or position if we saw that doing good work wasn\u2019t well correlated with success. This may provoke us to look for a different model that is better suited to our situation. A more nuanced explanation, however, can seem to fit almost any feedback you get from the environment, so it can be very hard to tell whether the approach you&#8217;re using is actually working.<\/p>\n<h2>Don\u2019t Look for the \u201cCorrect\u201d Approach, But Many Useful \u201cWrong\u201d Ones<\/h2>\n<p>The problem with simple models is that reality isn\u2019t simple, so often they are wrong. But, instead of trying to incorporate more and more factors into our decision-making process, I think it\u2019s better to consider multiple simple perspectives in isolation and switch between them as they become more accurate.<\/p>\n<p>To make sense of our career example, you might consider that there are several simple models of career success: one that says success is a function of your network, one that says it\u2019s a function of your ability, another that says having recognized credentials will determine your standing, all in isolation.<\/p>\n<p>Then, formulate your goals and plans on the basis of these rather simpler models and see how far they can take you. When you get stuck with applying a certain model, you may adopt a different one.<\/p>\n<h2>Why Separate, Simpler Models Work Better than One, Nuanced Approach<\/h2>\n<p>Having separate, simple models works better than trying to have one perfect theory for a few reasons.<\/p>\n<p>First, it avoids locking in on bad beliefs. If you accept, from the outset, that you\u2019re going to be applying a simplified model, you\u2019ll be less attached to it when it no longer applies. Accept that it might be useful in your situation and use it while it works. A perfect theory often struggles to adapt when the situation changes and you may get locked into a bad practice long after it has stopped working.<\/p>\n<p>Second, simple models are easier to take action from. When Cal and I were working on <a href=\"http:\/\/top-performer-course.com\/\">our career course<\/a>, we decided to adopt the simple model that career success depends on ability. For many people it\u2019s a pretty good, but imperfect, model. Once that has been established, it becomes a lot easier to decide how to work on that goal, than it would be if we were also trying to coach students on a million other possibly relevant, but confusing factors.<\/p>\n<p>Third, you can collect more simple models without having to declare one as correct and all others as wrong. Trying to have a nuanced, complete picture constantly forces you to defend your views against all contradictory models, which is often impossible. Having multiple, simplified models instead causes you to ask, \u201cwhere might each of these apply?\u201d<\/p>\n<h3>No Right Answers<\/h3>\n<p>I think this thinking strategy can be uncomfortable because we are always seeking the \u201ccorrect\u201d or \u201ctrue\u201d approach, despite the fact that for domains more complicated than particle physics, it\u2019s unlikely that such a tractable truth exists in any absolute terms.<\/p>\n<p>This leads to a philosophy of not seeking the \u201cright\u201d answer, but inviting multiple useful, but incomplete, answers. And while there may not be a correct answer, there are very often wrong ones, or models which are not useful in almost any situation. Being open to multiple possibly useful answers isn\u2019t the same as saying every answer is useful.<\/p>\n<p>Accepting simple models is merely accepting that all models are simplifications, and that it\u2019s not possible to fully comprehend and exactly specify the correct answer for most areas of human interest. The goal isn\u2019t to avoid any simplifications, but not to become trapped by them, given that they are unavoidable.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Nobody wants to be told their views are oversimplified. So, when thinking about issues, we tend to try to include as many factors as possible. The more nuanced our views become, the less likely they can be attacked for missing something important. But are more nuanced ways of thinking about a problem actually more useful? [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[681,658],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-6712","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-nc-mindset","7":"category-rationality","8":"entry"},"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Simplicity Beats Nuance: Why the Wrong Answer Can Often Beat the Correct One - Scott H Young<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/2017\/02\/14\/simple-models\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Simplicity Beats Nuance: Why the Wrong Answer Can Often Beat the Correct One - Scott H Young\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Nobody wants to be told their views are oversimplified. So, when thinking about issues, we tend to try to include as many factors as possible. The more nuanced our views become, the less likely they can be attacked for missing something important. But are more nuanced ways of thinking about a problem actually more useful? [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/2017\/02\/14\/simple-models\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Scott H Young\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/AuthorScottYoung\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-02-14T16:02:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-03-29T19:59:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"\/\/ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com\/e\/ir?t=scottcom-20&amp;l=ur2&amp;o=1\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Scott Young\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@scotthyoung\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@scotthyoung\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Scott Young\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scotthyoung.com\\\/blog\\\/2017\\\/02\\\/14\\\/simple-models\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scotthyoung.com\\\/blog\\\/2017\\\/02\\\/14\\\/simple-models\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Scott Young\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scotthyoung.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/2f58ab6c4a36422c78416e5b7a79604c\"},\"headline\":\"Simplicity Beats Nuance: Why the Wrong Answer Can Often Beat the Correct One\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-02-14T16:02:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-29T19:59:19+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scotthyoung.com\\\/blog\\\/2017\\\/02\\\/14\\\/simple-models\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1029,\"commentCount\":9,\"articleSection\":[\"Mindset\",\"Rationality\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scotthyoung.com\\\/blog\\\/2017\\\/02\\\/14\\\/simple-models\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scotthyoung.com\\\/blog\\\/2017\\\/02\\\/14\\\/simple-models\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scotthyoung.com\\\/blog\\\/2017\\\/02\\\/14\\\/simple-models\\\/\",\"name\":\"Simplicity Beats Nuance: Why the Wrong Answer Can Often Beat the Correct One - Scott H Young\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scotthyoung.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-02-14T16:02:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-29T19:59:19+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scotthyoung.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/2f58ab6c4a36422c78416e5b7a79604c\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scotthyoung.com\\\/blog\\\/2017\\\/02\\\/14\\\/simple-models\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scotthyoung.com\\\/blog\\\/2017\\\/02\\\/14\\\/simple-models\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scotthyoung.com\\\/blog\\\/2017\\\/02\\\/14\\\/simple-models\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scotthyoung.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Simplicity Beats Nuance: Why the Wrong Answer Can Often Beat the Correct One\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scotthyoung.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scotthyoung.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"Scott H Young\",\"description\":\"Learn faster, achieve more\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scotthyoung.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scotthyoung.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/2f58ab6c4a36422c78416e5b7a79604c\",\"name\":\"Scott Young\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a2da240fb070ba8346e3be8b89043b66c39bdcf933d9e7311dcb10383d0bc645?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a2da240fb070ba8346e3be8b89043b66c39bdcf933d9e7311dcb10383d0bc645?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a2da240fb070ba8346e3be8b89043b66c39bdcf933d9e7311dcb10383d0bc645?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Scott Young\"},\"description\":\"Hello, my name is Scott H. Young and I am obsessed with personal development! When I am not reading several books a month on the subject I am constantly trying to find new ways to improve and get more out of life.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scotthyoung.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scotthyoung.com\\\/blog\\\/author\\\/scottadmin\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Simplicity Beats Nuance: Why the Wrong Answer Can Often Beat the Correct One - Scott H Young","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/2017\/02\/14\/simple-models\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Simplicity Beats Nuance: Why the Wrong Answer Can Often Beat the Correct One - Scott H Young","og_description":"Nobody wants to be told their views are oversimplified. So, when thinking about issues, we tend to try to include as many factors as possible. The more nuanced our views become, the less likely they can be attacked for missing something important. But are more nuanced ways of thinking about a problem actually more useful? [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/2017\/02\/14\/simple-models\/","og_site_name":"Scott H Young","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/AuthorScottYoung\/","article_published_time":"2017-02-14T16:02:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-03-29T19:59:19+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"\/\/ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com\/e\/ir?t=scottcom-20&amp;l=ur2&amp;o=1","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"author":"Scott Young","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@scotthyoung","twitter_site":"@scotthyoung","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Scott Young","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/2017\/02\/14\/simple-models\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/2017\/02\/14\/simple-models\/"},"author":{"name":"Scott Young","@id":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/2f58ab6c4a36422c78416e5b7a79604c"},"headline":"Simplicity Beats Nuance: Why the Wrong Answer Can Often Beat the Correct One","datePublished":"2017-02-14T16:02:22+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-29T19:59:19+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/2017\/02\/14\/simple-models\/"},"wordCount":1029,"commentCount":9,"articleSection":["Mindset","Rationality"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/2017\/02\/14\/simple-models\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/2017\/02\/14\/simple-models\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/2017\/02\/14\/simple-models\/","name":"Simplicity Beats Nuance: Why the Wrong Answer Can Often Beat the Correct One - Scott H Young","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-02-14T16:02:22+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-29T19:59:19+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/2f58ab6c4a36422c78416e5b7a79604c"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/2017\/02\/14\/simple-models\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/2017\/02\/14\/simple-models\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/2017\/02\/14\/simple-models\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Simplicity Beats Nuance: Why the Wrong Answer Can Often Beat the Correct One"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/","name":"Scott H Young","description":"Learn faster, achieve more","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/2f58ab6c4a36422c78416e5b7a79604c","name":"Scott Young","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a2da240fb070ba8346e3be8b89043b66c39bdcf933d9e7311dcb10383d0bc645?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a2da240fb070ba8346e3be8b89043b66c39bdcf933d9e7311dcb10383d0bc645?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a2da240fb070ba8346e3be8b89043b66c39bdcf933d9e7311dcb10383d0bc645?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Scott Young"},"description":"Hello, my name is Scott H. Young and I am obsessed with personal development! When I am not reading several books a month on the subject I am constantly trying to find new ways to improve and get more out of life.","sameAs":["https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com"],"url":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/author\/scottadmin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6712","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6712"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6712\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6714,"href":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6712\/revisions\/6714"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6712"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6712"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6712"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}