{"id":578,"date":"2011-02-03T13:04:32","date_gmt":"2011-02-03T21:04:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/scotthyoung.com\/members\/?p=578"},"modified":"2011-02-03T13:04:32","modified_gmt":"2011-02-03T21:04:32","slug":"ass-kicking-email-learning-by-doing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/members\/?p=578","title":{"rendered":"Ass-Kicking Email: Learning by Doing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Hey,<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s commonly accepted that one of the best ways to learn something<br \/>\nis by actually doing it.<\/p>\n<p>Business skills are often best learned by actually running a<br \/>\nbusiness. Programming skills come from actually hacking together<br \/>\nprograms. Writing expertise comes from doing a lot of writing.<\/p>\n<p>While this is certainly true, it&#8217;s actually a little strange.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>After all, schools, self-study programs and other educational<br \/>\ninitiatives have as their PRIMARY goal of learning. Whereas when<br \/>\nactually engaged in an activity, learning is typically a by-product.<\/p>\n<p>When I attend business school, my entire goal is to learn skills of<br \/>\nbusiness. When I run a business, my goal is mostly to keep the<br \/>\nbusiness going, learning is merely a side-effect of that process.<\/p>\n<p>Considering education has learning as it&#8217;s sole goal, why do we find<br \/>\nthat learning by doing still works better in many cases?<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>Part of the reason that learning-by-doing often works better than<br \/>\ndeliberate education, is that it is highly optimized to the real<br \/>\nworld.<\/p>\n<p>When you take on educational tasks, it&#8217;s easy for teachers and<br \/>\nlearners to get sidetracked and miss what is crucially important to<br \/>\nthe outside world.<\/p>\n<p>Another reason might be simply the institutional disadvantages of<br \/>\neducation towards certain types of skills. Teaching ethics, for<br \/>\nexample, is relatively easy to do in a class. Instilling actual<br \/>\nmoral deliberation and judgment under pressure is extremely hard<br \/>\nto simulate.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>But if learning-by-doing, which most of the time is simply<br \/>\nlearning-as-a-by-product outperforms a lot of formal education, is<br \/>\nthere a third alternative?<\/p>\n<p>Is there a way to learn even better the skills we normally believe<br \/>\ncan only be learned by doing?<\/p>\n<p>I think there is.<\/p>\n<p>The fix isn&#8217;t to exchange learning-by-doing for a sterile<br \/>\nenvironment. It&#8217;s to refocus the goals of the activity more<br \/>\nstringently on learning and improvement.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>Learning by Deliberate Practice<\/p>\n<p>I see two ingredients in this superior way to learn skills:<\/p>\n<p>1. Taking on real projects you care about.<br \/>\n2. Making decisions based on the principles of deliberate practice.<\/p>\n<p>Taking on real projects is the &#8220;doing&#8221; part of learning-by-doing.<br \/>\nThis means you don&#8217;t engage in fake, hypothetical activities, just<br \/>\nto get a grade. You pick projects you actually care about.<\/p>\n<p>The second step though, is to guide your development of these<br \/>\nprojects based on deliberate practice. I&#8217;ll share a few examples:<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>The first way you can do this is through using your project to test<br \/>\na particular hypothesis. That is, the project is your attempt to<br \/>\nanswer a question about the world that would be difficult to uncover<br \/>\notherwise.<\/p>\n<p>When I write new ebooks, I usually have my stated goal in terms of<br \/>\nsales and audience reaction. But I also use them as an opportunity<br \/>\nto test theories about writing and business.<\/p>\n<p>When I first released Learn More, Study Less in 2008, my hypothesis<br \/>\nwas to see if people would pay for a premium ebook (which turned out<br \/>\nto be incredibly successful).<\/p>\n<p>Later I tried multiple pricing tiers with a different ebook, and it<br \/>\nfailed miserably. By incorporating explicit tests into my projects,<br \/>\nI learned more than if I had just pursued the status quo.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>Another way to do this is to engineer projects to focus on maximal<br \/>\nchallenge per unit of time.<\/p>\n<p>When I work on projects, I try to outsource or reduce elements that<br \/>\ndon&#8217;t push my skills in a particular area. This means I end up<br \/>\nlearning more, than if I made a new project which didn&#8217;t challenge<br \/>\nme.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>A final way to do incorporate deliberate practice into your real<br \/>\nworld projects, is to make them small and focused on areas you<br \/>\naren&#8217;t great at yet.<\/p>\n<p>Large projects tend to have a lot of filler. Parts where you&#8217;re no<br \/>\nlonger learning new things.<\/p>\n<p>Smaller projects tend to be more tightly focused on a challenge.<br \/>\nPlus you can guide these smaller projects to test you in a specific<br \/>\nway.<\/p>\n<p>For example, if you were trying to improve your speaking skills,<br \/>\ntaking on small, unusual opportunities to speak in public would be<br \/>\nmore beneficial than sticking just to class\/work presentations.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>Try to think of your own ways you can structure your real world<br \/>\nprojects to increase your learning rate!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Hey, It&#8217;s commonly accepted that one of the best ways to learn something is by actually doing it. Business skills are often best learned by actually running a business. Programming skills come from actually hacking together programs. Writing expertise comes from doing a lot of writing. While this is certainly true, it&#8217;s actually a little [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/members\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/578"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/members\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/members\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/members\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/members\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=578"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/members\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/578\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":579,"href":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/members\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/578\/revisions\/579"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/members\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=578"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/members\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=578"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/members\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=578"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}