{"id":613,"date":"2011-03-01T12:57:45","date_gmt":"2011-03-01T20:57:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/scotthyoung.com\/members\/?p=613"},"modified":"2011-03-01T12:57:45","modified_gmt":"2011-03-01T20:57:45","slug":"bootcamp-day-three-copy-the-mental-hacks-of-a-savant-genius","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/members\/?p=613","title":{"rendered":"Bootcamp: Day Three &#8211; Copy the mental hacks of a savant genius"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Hey,<\/p>\n<p>How do geniuses learn?<\/p>\n<p>Do they learn the same way, just with neurons firing faster? Or do<br \/>\nthey learn differently, using some shortcut normal people miss?<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s hard to say for sure, but people like Daniel Tammet make me<br \/>\nsuspect the latter.<\/p>\n<p>Daniel is a savant. However, unlike many savants with highly-focused<br \/>\nareas of ability, Daniel&#8217;s skills range from hyper-rapid language<br \/>\nacquisition to supercomputer mathematical ability.<\/p>\n<p>What makes Daniel most interesting, however, is that he is often<br \/>\ndescribed as the &#8220;Rosetta Stone&#8221; of savants, because not only are<br \/>\nhis abilities impressive (he knows \u03c0 to over twenty thousand digits)<br \/>\nbut he can describe how he achieves them.<\/p>\n<p>Part of Daniel&#8217;s secret may lie in his ability to take abstract<br \/>\nnumbers and calculations and represent them as visual images. For<br \/>\nexample, he states that, &#8220;289 is ugly&#8221; and &#8220;333 is attractive&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>While Daniel&#8217;s mastery of visualizations may be difficult to<br \/>\nreplicate, using imagery as a learning tactic is one of the holistic<br \/>\ntactics I teach in Learning on Steroids.<\/p>\n<p>Today I&#8217;ll show how you can replicate a bit of savant-like genius.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>How to Use Visualizations to Learn Better<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s an actual sample guide from Learning on Steroids, which<br \/>\nexplains how you can do exactly that&#8211;use visualizations to remember<br \/>\nand learn better:<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/bit.ly\/6Atecp (PDF Link)<\/p>\n<p>In the guide I walk through step-by-step how you can create images<br \/>\nto make abstract concepts both more memorable and easier to<br \/>\nunderstand.<\/p>\n<p>If you were having trouble with the metaphors tactic, this one can<br \/>\nactually be easier to start, since you don&#8217;t need to be particularly<br \/>\ncreative all at once. You just need to start with a random sketch<br \/>\nthen move up to better images.<\/p>\n<p>This guide also forms the basis of more specialized tactics I teach<br \/>\nin Learning on Steroids for remembering vocabulary or formulas.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>Creating Brilliant Metaphors to Make Learning Faster<\/p>\n<p>Ask and you shall receive. I spent a good chunk of this morning<br \/>\nreading over the many replies I got to my request for metaphors.<\/p>\n<p>The most important step is getting started, here&#8217;s what one student<br \/>\nwrote back to me after coming up with a metaphor:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The last part of your message made me do this.  I really didn&#8217;t<br \/>\nthink I could do this.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>We&#8217;ve been labelled and told for so much of our lives whether we&#8217;re<br \/>\n&#8220;creative&#8221;, &#8220;math-people&#8221;, &#8220;visual&#8221; or &#8220;smart&#8221; that sometimes the<br \/>\nhardest step to learning faster is to break those labels and begin<br \/>\nthinking in a new way.<\/p>\n<p>I really appreciate all the people who replied and took the first<br \/>\nstep. If you haven&#8217;t yet, watch the video ( http:\/\/bit.ly\/bNBc6e )<br \/>\nand then hit REPLY with your response.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>Now that many of you have taken your first steps, I&#8217;m going to show<br \/>\nyou how you can make your metaphors even more powerful.<\/p>\n<p>First: It&#8217;s important to remember QUANTITY over QUALITY. Once you<br \/>\nstart thinking in metaphors, you&#8217;ll naturally get better and faster<br \/>\nat them, so the first chasm to cross is inaction.<\/p>\n<p>Going beyond that, however, there&#8217;s a big range in the power of<br \/>\ndifferent metaphors to help learning. When I gave my spontaneous<br \/>\nchallenge, the majority of answers were fairly weak metaphors or<br \/>\nwhat I&#8217;ll call &#8220;memory aids&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Memory aids relate the words or arbitrary facts of an idea, but they<br \/>\ndon&#8217;t connect the underlying concept. For example, with Pythagoras&#8217;<br \/>\nTheorem, many people gave metaphors such as:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;If you take a square and add a square of bees, surely the result<br \/>\nwould be a square of the Sea.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>For the person who came up with this, you&#8217;re not alone and it&#8217;s not<br \/>\na problem using this as a starting point. I can&#8217;t repeat enough that<br \/>\nquantity matters first.<\/p>\n<p>However the reason this is a less powerful metaphor is that it tells<br \/>\nyou nothing about the underlying concept. It&#8217;s simply a mnemonic<br \/>\ndevice which allows you to remember a formula without understanding<br \/>\nit better.<\/p>\n<p>In the program, I try to offer deeper advice for making more useful<br \/>\nmetaphors that are not only memorable, but greatly increase your<br \/>\nunderstanding.<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s look at a few ways to do that.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>Dissecting the Mental Process of Great Analogies<\/p>\n<p>The way to make stronger metaphors, and avoid just creating memory<br \/>\naids, is to try to relate the underlying concept of an idea, not<br \/>\nsimply the words or outer facts. (A notable exception is vocabulary,<br \/>\nwhere the word IS the underlying idea)<\/p>\n<p>One way to do that is to ask yourself &#8220;what&#8217;s going on?&#8221; within an<br \/>\nidea, and from there try to relate it to other concepts.<\/p>\n<p>Using my example from yesterday (the earth&#8217;s tilt creating seasons)<br \/>\nI started by asking myself what the concept was that underlies this<br \/>\nidea. I came up with two things:<\/p>\n<p>1. Light is spread over a larger surface area closer to the poles.<br \/>\n2. The changing *relative* tilt of the earth changes the angle to<br \/>\nthe sun and thus the level of energy as per #1.<\/p>\n<p>Now that I&#8217;ve gotten at the underlying concept, I can make more<br \/>\nuseful metaphors. I start by using the SIMILARITY approach and<br \/>\nasking what #1 reminds me of.<\/p>\n<p>The only thing that comes to mind is a circle of silly putty being<br \/>\nspread over a dome. In the center, the putty doesn&#8217;t need to stretch<br \/>\nmuch to cover it, but in the edges it has to become thinner and<br \/>\nthinner to cover the same area.<\/p>\n<p>Is it a bulky, less elegant metaphor? Certainly. But it&#8217;s a good<br \/>\nstarting point for building a more powerful metaphor.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s take the third example, that the English-speaking countries<br \/>\nuse a common-law system and Latin countries use the civil system.<\/p>\n<p>Again, most people started by creating memory aids, which linked<br \/>\nthe systems by their words, not their underlying concepts. A good<br \/>\nstart, but let&#8217;s see if we can do better.<\/p>\n<p>Using the HISTORICAL method, I could do a quick Wikipedia search of<br \/>\nthe two systems, and after a minute or two, I would discover that<br \/>\nthe civil system stems from the Romans while the common law is based<br \/>\non tradition.<\/p>\n<p>This forms the basis of many possible metaphors. Since one is based<br \/>\non tradition, and the other a unified code, it reminds me of how<br \/>\nFrench and Spanish have formal institutes officiating over their<br \/>\nusage, where there is no official English institution and it is<br \/>\ngoverned by tradition.<\/p>\n<p>I could go for a slightly less relevant metaphor of comparing the<br \/>\nhighly organized civil system in France and more organic system in<br \/>\nEngland to the difference between French and English gardens.<\/p>\n<p>Would you necessarily have thought of these two possible metaphors?<\/p>\n<p>Probably not. But that&#8217;s not the point. Just because I think of<br \/>\nthe mathematical precision of French gardens and the codified<br \/>\nbureaucracy of the Acad\u00e9mie Fran\u00e7aise, doesn&#8217;t mean you have to.<\/p>\n<p>What makes these metaphors more useful is that they link to the<br \/>\nconcepts (what IS the civil vs. common law systems?) rather than<br \/>\njust the words &#8220;civil&#8221; and &#8220;common&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>Mastering Images and Metaphors to Learn Faster<\/p>\n<p>Both in Daniel Tammet&#8217;s genius mathematical displays and perfect<br \/>\nanalogies, there&#8217;s a tendency to view the final product and feel<br \/>\nlike it&#8217;s impossible to replicate their abilities.<\/p>\n<p>The reality is that creating metaphors and visceralizations which<br \/>\nallow you to rapidly understand ideas takes a bit of practice and<br \/>\nthe mental process has a few rough drafts.<\/p>\n<p>For creating strong metaphors, a good step-by-step approach would<br \/>\nlook something like:<\/p>\n<p>1. Ask what the underlying concept is to an idea.<br \/>\n2. Use HISTORY, SIMILARITY or STORY to come up with a rough start.<br \/>\n3. Try expanding the metaphor to see where it fits and where it&#8217;s<br \/>\nweak. My silly-putty metaphor for seasons works for the first<br \/>\nunderlying concept, but it doesn&#8217;t work as well for the second.<\/p>\n<p>If this all seems too complicated and difficult, remember to start<br \/>\nwith simple metaphors. As you get more practice, it will be easier<br \/>\nto automatically think of metaphors when you encounter new subjects.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s still a few hours left to submit your metaphor for the<br \/>\ncontest to get a copy of my book, Learn More, Study Less. I&#8217;ll be<br \/>\nannouncing the winner in tomorrow&#8217;s email.<\/p>\n<p>If you&#8217;ve read this far and haven&#8217;t taken action, please hit REPLY<br \/>\nand give it your best shot!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Hey, How do geniuses learn? Do they learn the same way, just with neurons firing faster? Or do they learn differently, using some shortcut normal people miss?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/members\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/613"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/members\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/members\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/members\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/members\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=613"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/members\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/613\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":614,"href":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/members\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/613\/revisions\/614"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/members\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=613"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/members\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=613"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scotthyoung.com\/members\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=613"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}