Bootcamp: Day Two – The tactic a Pulitzer-winning author uses to teach

Hey,

One of my biggest joys is writing about a technique for learning and
then finding out that some of the smartest people on earth already
use it to learn better.

I was reading the book I am a Strange Loop by Douglas Hofstadter
after publishing yesterday’s bootcamp lesson.

For those of you who don’t know, Hofstadter won the Pulitzer Prize
for nonfiction (the Academy Award of writing) for his first book on
consciousness and self-referential systems, Gödel, Escher, Bach.

In the book, Hofstadter writes about metaphors:

[One] of my firmest conclusions is that we always think by seeking
and drawing parallels to things we know from our past, and that
we therefore communicate best when we exploit examples, analogies
and metaphors galore.

Even in teaching a topic as abstract as the philosophy of
consciousness, Hofstadter avoids abstractions and sticks with
down-to-earth metaphors.

Training Metaphor-Based Thinking

There are two main criticisms whenever I suggest people use holistic
tactics to learn faster:

1. That’s just fluff. Metaphors may work for easy topics, but in
[some “hard” subject] that method won’t work.

2. I can’t learn with metaphors. Maybe holistic learning is just
something you’re born with.

The first criticism is empirically false. I’ve worked with hundreds
of students over the last few years, and people have successfully
used the rapid learning tactics on math to law, languages to music.

I bring up Hofstadter’s example because in his fields, philosophy
of mind and cognitive science are overrun with either esoteric
abstractions or unimaginative explanations. By using metaphor and
analogy, he writes award-winning, best-selling books on topics that
normally never leave a university library.

The second criticism is also false. Anyone can become a more
holistic learner, using metaphors and other tactics to learn better.
I have dozens of cases of students who practiced the tactics and
got better grades, studied less or both.

How can you do it?

Quantity over Quality

The first step is to focus on quantity over quality. I got a lot of
responses back from people for the contest where they claimed, “I
haven’t come up with a metaphor yet.”

My guess is that these people are searching for perfect, witty
metaphors that are beautiful explanations. The problem is that in
expecting perfection, they reduce their output to zero.

One of the reasons I created Learning on Steroids was to give people
an environment where they could practice regularly, share advice and
get feedback. Going alone makes it harder to create.

Consistency over Inspiration

The second step is to develop a practice schedule and follow it
consistently.

I know what you’re saying, “I thought this was supposed to SAVE me
time! Now you’re telling me I need to practice MORE!?”

Yes, you need to practice. But unlike going to the gym, you can use
your practice when you’re already learning. Taking Nayamot’s example
from the last case, he implemented a 30-Day training regimen, but
saved enough time that he was able to go from struggling to
finishing early.

This is also where Learning on Steroids can help. Since we run group
30-Day Trials in the forums, you can have an audience to keep you
focused so you’ll get over the initial weirdness of using the ideas
and start learning faster.

Breaking Old Habits

Once you get past those first few attempts, it becomes easier and
easier to apply the methods.

When I first started training image association for vocabulary (one
of the tactics we teach) it took several minutes to remember each
vocabulary word. After I got through the first few, I could
remember lists of dozens in just a few minutes.

It’s not just about KNOWING what to do. It’s about breaking your
habits so that you do it automatically.

Practice Time!

Since I know some of you are still struggling to find that “perfect”
example to win the contest, I’m going to give you guys a helping
hand.

Pick one of these three ideas, create a metaphor for it and hit
REPLY. If you later come up with a better one for the contest before
Saturday, you can use that one too. If you don’t, then you’ll still
have a chance to win a free copy of Learn More, Study Less.

Pick ONE of these ideas and create a metaphor, using either
SIMILARITY, HISTORY or STORIES (or any other method you want!):

1. IDEA: Seasons occur because the earth has a tilt on its axis.
2. IDEA: Pythagoras’s Theorem: a^2 + b^2 = c^2
3. IDEA: English-speaking countries use the common law system while
most romance-language countries use the civil law system.

You don’t have to use these three, they are just starting points if
you’re not sure what to do–just pick ONE of them and hit REPLY.

The goal here isn’t to come up with a perfect metaphor, just to get
yourself used to the idea of THINKING IN METAPHORS. Once you cross
that hurdle, you can start becoming more creative and vivid in your
attempts.

If you have no idea what I’m talking about, please check out the
first day of the bootcamp.

If you haven’t already, hit REPLY. If you don’t take action now,
you almost certainly won’t be able to make use of it in your life.

 

David K Wong

March 18, 2011,10:21 am

IDEA: Seasons occur because the earth has a tilt on its axis.
Metaphor: globe on a stand tilted with the four seasons around it.


Marci

December 2, 2012,7:11 pm

1. IDEA: Seasons occur because the earth has a tilt on its axis.
Imagine the Earth is like a person with arms, legs and a body, the north pole is like the top of the head or bald spot of the Earth. During the summer, imagine the Earth is hot so it dives (or tilts forward) into a pool. This is what happens in summer, the northern hemisphere is in closest contact with the sun because the Earth is tilted forward. In winter imagine the Earth falling back onto a pile of snow to do snow angels. This is what the Earth (northern hemisphere) does in winter, it tilts back (or away) from the sun.

2. IDEA: Pythagoras’s Theorem: a^2 + b^2 = c^2
Imagine a water slide at water park. The water slide (c2) is equal to the distance you have to walk to the stairs (b2) + the stairs you need to climb to the top of the water ramp (a2).

3. IDEA: Difference between common law and civil law.
Common law is like a popularity contest or a gladiator match where two adversaries compete and try to convince an audience (jury) they are better, the match is moderated by the Emperor (judge) who decides if they live (go free) or are fed to the lions (go to prison). This is common law, two people present arguments to a jury composed of civilians, and are moderated by a judge. Civil law is like a fencing competition where there are rules and penalties that have to be paid. This is like Civil law where the law is not based on precedent, like common law, but exist as a group of already established laws.


Henrique Athayde

December 17, 2012,5:35 am

There’s a metaphor I’ve created myself to remember the simplified technique for creating metaphor’s which you taught in LoS: creating a metaphor is like building a table: first you have the brute log, which is the raw idea itself, from where you should refine and pick the best pieces of wood (1 or 1 main ideas) and then, with those pieces, building the “table” (the metaphor). Once you’ve got this simplest piece of furniture done, it’s just a matter of implementing it and adding mora details (ornaments, cloth, polishment, etc) which is the step for expanding the ideas and making it more complete


Colin Robinson

February 6, 2013,9:43 am

2. Idea: Pythagorean thoerem = a2 + b2 = c2. The pythagorean theorem is like if you have one group of bicycles plus another group of bicycles, it will equal the third group of bicycles.


simone souza

January 2, 2014,5:27 pm

3.IDEA: English-speaking countries use the common law system while
most romance-language countries use the civil law system.
I imagine English-speaking countries as a viking whose hair is blonde and romance-language countries as a Roman warrior whose hair is brown. The thing is that the hair( at least for me) represent the law, which both of them have but at the same time is different from one another. The Roman warrior also reminds me of Latin, the language they spoke, which at the same time reminds me of the Italic languages and the countries that speak them.


siqiong zheng

December 25, 2014,4:20 pm

3


Leave a Reply

login

Username:

Password:

Remember Me