Games Worth Playing

The most important choice you can make in life is deciding which games you’re going to play.

Life is full of games. There’s the getting-in-shape game, the climbing-the-corporate-ladder game, the saving-enough-for-retirement game and the get-married-and-have-kids game.

Like all games, these all have objectives, rules and players. Sometimes the games are strictly well-defined, like the becoming-an-Olympic-athlete game. In others, the rules are mostly implicit, but most the players still understand what they’re playing for and why.

Most people spend their lives playing games and trying to win at them.

Far fewer think deeply about which games they want to play in the first place.

Why We Play Games

Games are just a metaphor, of course. But something like this is happening in most of our minds. It’s hard to think about life in the big picture. It’s too big, fuzzy and important to think clearly about.

As a result of this, we tend to break apart the big puzzle into smaller and smaller games, so we can understand them better. The games we play just for fun, are formed on this idea: break off some section of reality and give it strict rules, boundaries and choices.

Life, as an ambiguous, grand thing, therefore tends to get spliced down to smaller games which can actually be won.

Games Within Games

Sometimes the first efforts to cleave apart the messiness of life into tidy little games still leaves quite a bit of confusion. Therefore, we tend to break those bigger games into smaller ones.

The career game, for many people who start working in a large company, often gets replaced with the earning-pay-raises-and-promotions game. For other people, the career game gets reduced to the becoming-a-prestigious-expert game or the earning-more-money game.

The more complex of the games we play for fun show the same pattern. Chess masters often talk about playing the King’s Indian or Spanish game, as if it were a separate, sub-game within chess. The game of chess is so complex that we need to further tighten the boundaries to think clearly about it.

As a result, life is not just playing games, but playing games within games within games. Each level inherits the assumptions and boundaries of the one above it, but adds new constraints and rules, while narrowing the scope of the objective.

How We Choose What to Play

Most people choose what games to play by following a simple heuristic: look around them to see what others are playing and join in.

On the whole, this isn’t such a bad idea. Games are more fun with other people. Plus, the bigger, higher-order games tend to value social perception as a partial objective, so more popular games are often intrinsically more valuable to play.

However, this copycat approach suffers from a few key flaws.

First, when everyone copycats, this can result in people too many people playing the same game. The game becomes so competitive and cutthroat that winning the larger game which contains it becomes harder and harder to do.

Second, this limits the invention of new games. Most people are so busy playing the games they see everyone else playing, that they don’t recognize that there is even a choice involved in picking which game to play.

Most people think the objective of the career game is earn more money, gain a higher rank or increase your professional stature. Then, along comes someone who decides that a game involving living on a low-income and retiring exceptionally young sounds like a lot more fun.

Most people think the consumer game is about having the most and best stuff. Then, along comes people who decide having fewer things is the way to win.

Most people think being rich is the way to win. While others compete to give things away.

Picking the Games Worth Playing

The first step is to realize that you have a choice. That you’ve always had a choice about which games you want to play.

The second step is to see what games you’re playing already. Everyone is playing games. Human nature is to play games. Those who claim to not be playing games are usually just so deep inside their own game that they fail to see it as one anymore.

The third step is to ask yourself if you’d like to play a different game. Maybe you’re playing one game and you realize some people are playing a different one and you’d like to join them. Maybe you want to invent your own game to play and see if other people join you.

Finally, the most important thing to realize is that play is voluntary. Games have consequences, of course, but as long as you accept the price of losing, nothing can force you to participate.

 It’s this choice of which games not to play, that is ultimately the most valuable. Only by giving up on some games, can you win the ones that matter to you.

Richard Feynman on Self-Doubt and Meeting Others’ Expectations

We all have moments of self-doubt. Times when we feel we can’t possibly live up to the high expectations other people put upon us.

I think it’s comforting to know that you’re not alone. Richard Feynman, who would go on to win a Nobel Prize and be one of the greatest physicists of the 20th century, felt the same way.

After the death of his wife and working for the Manhattan Project during WWII to construct the first atom bomb, he felt burned out:

“When it came time to do some research, I couldn’t get to work. I was a little tired; I was not interested; I couldn’t do research! … I was convinced that from the war and everything else (the death of my wife) I had simply burned out.”

At this time, he was invited to participate at an elite research institution. Of course, to Feynman, he was already washed up. There was no more useful work that could be wrung out of him, so to take up such an offer would be an enormous mistake.

“And then I thought to myself, ‘You know, what they think of you is so fantastic, it’s impossible to live up to it. You have no responsibility to live up to it!’

“It was a brilliant idea: You have no responsibility to live up to what other people think you ought to accomplish. I have no responsibility to be like they expect me to be. It’s their mistake, not my failing.” [emphasis added]

You Have No Responsibility to Be What Others Expect of You

Now, of course, the twist in the story is that Feynman did live up to those expectations. He went on to have an enormously influential physics career. But it was only possible once he dropped his perception of the expectations being placed on him.

“Then I had another thought: Physics disgusts me a little bit now, but I used to enjoy doing physics. Why did I enjoy it? I used to play with it. I used to do whatever I felt like doing—it didn’t have to do with whether it was important for the development of nuclear physics, but whether it was interesting and amusing for me to play with.”

Interestingly, the expectations Feynman faces from his colleagues and employers wasn’t explicit. Rather, it was his own perception of those expectations that felt intolerable. However, I strongly suspect that there was no small part of those expectations that Feynman had placed upon himself.

Often it’s not the expectations of other people that burn us out and make us miserable, but those we place on ourselves.

Setting the Right Standard

Too low of a standard, and you won’t make a change. Too high a bar, and you’ll avoid what seems to be an inevitable failure. Expectations, like every virtue, are always a matter of moderation.

However, sometimes we perceive the standards from other people as being beyond our abilities. Perfectionism and procrastination result.

In these moments, I think it’s helpful to remember Feynman’s advice, and remind yourself that you have no responsibility to live up to what people expect of you. And that sometimes, you must forget those expectations in order to really fulfill your potential.

This story was first told in Feynman’s autobiography, Surely You’re Joking Mr. Feynman. We covered it in our book club and podcast here.

AS SEEN IN