Watch Out for “Good” Ideas

Whenever I hear unanimous opinion a new idea or plan I have is “good”, I get suspicious.

Until recently, however, I couldn’t articulate the cause of that suspicion. After all, if most people think an idea is good, shouldn’t that give me more confidence in it, not less?

I think I’ve figured out the trigger for my mistrust. Normally when I start a new project, I get mixed reactions. Some people think its great, others think it’s a waste of time and many other people either don’t care or don’t understand. This happens a lot.

I heard it when I started an online business. “That’s not a real job.” “Who’s going to pay you?” “That sounds fake.”

I heard it when I wanted to move to France. “But you don’t speak French…” “Won’t that be too expensive?” “The French aren’t friendly, you should go somewhere else.”

I heard it when I planned to start the MIT Challenge. “People don’t care about learning, all they want is a degree.” “Sounds like a lot of work.” “Huh?”

Of course, for each of these I also had people who thought the idea was terrific. The feedback wasn’t all negative, just completely unpredictable.

Looking back, I see that the projects that gathered the most confusion, celebration and discouragement, were by far the most profitable. Not all of them panned out—but in most cases failure was cheap and forgettable. Who cares that I started out this blog, not to write, but to produce a goal-setting game? (Nobody, because it was terrible.)

A Flipped Intuition

Over time, my successes from these mixed-feedback projects flipped my intuition for undertaking projects. Now, instead of feeling good about undertaking something that had unanimous appeal and feeling worried about projects with mixed feedback, that sentiment was reversed.

Now I’m more worried about projects that are “an obvious next step for you” or “sound like a good idea”. The safe bets now feel like they carry a lot more risk, and now I think I understand why.

Shifting the Burden of Research

Whenever I undertake projects that elicit mixed reactions, I research the heck out of it. I carefully examine what I want to do, why I want to do it and try to anticipate and reduce opportunity and failure costs. The critiques charge me to patch up weaknesses in a project which may be riddled with them.

Contrast this with “sounds good” projects. Because you get mild encouragement from everyone, you don’t question the fundamental assumptions. Why are you doing it? What benefits do you expect to achieve? What basis do you have for expecting them?

These questions go unasked because nobody pushes you to ask them. Discouragement and outright haters serve a useful purpose here. They force hard-nosed introspection you’re unlikely to get from sycophantic conformists.

Feeling Safe Promotes Dangerous Actions

An interesting tidbit of psychological research is that people drive safer when they aren’t wearing seatbelts. This doesn’t cancel out the safety of wearing one, but it does mean that feeling safer makes you worry less about driving cautiously.

In contrast, when you feel at risk, what do you do? You prepare like crazy. You plan for contingencies. You research possible outcomes. You brace yourself for worst cases.

A little fear helps you focus. Too much causes you to break down. The ideal amount of danger is one that encourages preparation but doesn’t discourage action.

The problem is that ‘good’ ideas are often not protective like a seatbelt. They may be just as risky and dangerous as a less conventional plan. But because they feel safe and normal, they promote a casualness that is often misguided.

Should You Go to University?

No question fits this pattern more than going to university. I personally think university is a great idea for many people. Even the people who can self-educate, university offers accreditation and signaling that you can’t get on your own. For many people it’s a great investment.

Except when its not. Racking up six-figure debt for anything that doesn’t offer excellent job prospects may be enlightening, but it’s way riskier than doing a start-up, travelling the world or even skipping school entirely to do something daring. Risk, in this sense doesn’t make a project good or bad, it just makes it have a higher variability of outcomes.

Yet this is also an investment that generates unanimous applause. School may be a great choice, but because it is a ‘good’ idea, it encourages a carelessness in its research and execution that hurts many people who would otherwise benefit from it.

Why are You Wasting Money on Rent?

Home ownership is another ‘good’ idea that will get your back patted by those around you and is rarely questioned thoroughly. To most people the alternative, renting, is an obvious waste of money.

Owning can be great. You get control, access to property that is difficult to rent and avoid loathsome landlords. Mortgage payments are also commit yourself to investing some of your money each month in a fixed asset, which you might have otherwise spent. For some people, home ownership is a great decision.

Except when its not. Mortgage payments can be more than 50% interest—meaning even for home owners, half of the money they pay is ‘waste’. Ownership also entails hidden costs like maintenance, insurance and property tax. Housing is also illiquid and undiversified.

I’ll probably buy a house when I’m confident I’ll stay put for several years or more and I want the space and freedom to customize my living arrangements. But buying just because it’s a ‘good’ idea? No thank you.

Be Your Own Nay-Sayer

My advice is simple: if everyone around you is encouraging a choice, be the person who questions it. Not because the advice is bad (many ‘good’ ideas really are just that, good) but because risk-proofing and research shouldn’t be ignored just because a choice is ‘safe’.

Second, if your plan is getting both hate and praise, that means it is more uncertain. But, that doesn’t necessarily make it a bad idea. Many great, even safe, projects have mixed feedback because they are unusual and people don’t have experience with them.

However, if an idea gets unanimously bad feedback from people who are experienced with it—take heed. The idea might still be a good one, but the research and hard-nosed introspection you need should go up a notch. And, if afterwards you’re still convinced it’s worth a shot, you should prepare your worst case thoroughly.

No idea should be considered ‘safe’ or ‘obvious’ without due process. When that happens, you get lazy and careless. Tear apart the ‘good’ ideas you have, in order to make them great ones.

Read This Next
Double Your Reading Rate
  • George Millo

    One word: Bitcoin.

    The idea of a digital currency is interesting, and will surely have an impact, although I have no idea how big. But the fact that everyone is now raving about how world-changing Bitcoin is and how everyone should be investing has killed my enthusiasm for it personally. The ship has sailed.

    Totally agreed on university and housing. University was absolutely the wrong decision for me and totally not worth the £20,000 of debt I’m now in. I only went because it was what was expected of me, and because it was easier than not going. What a waste of time. There’s NOTHING I do now that I couldn’t have done three years earlier.

    And to quote James Altucher, I’d rather shoot myself in the head than own a home.

  • J Tran

    Agreed with the owning a home thing! I’d rather not get locked down into one location for a period of time.

    For me, going to a community college before transferring to a four-year might be one of the less ‘good’ ideas that people tend to look down upon. But for me, it’s an opportunity to go through basically the same curriculum, hone my academic skills, and have a second chance for a perfect GPA before transferring, all while saving a mountain of cash and hopefully graduating debt-free.

    Living in California, there is even a (small) chance that I might gain admittance to schools like Stanford or Berkeley, which would not have been possible had I applied directly after high school due to me having a relatively low GPA.

  • rakgadi

    I agree with what Scott has to say in this blog post.

    I spent 3yrs at varsity, didn’t graduate, I did what was expected of me. I took a gap year. After the gap year people questioned my choice in wanting to change direction. The feed back was 99% negative.

    Before changing direction, and even now that I’m close to completing my current degree I do research checking if my plan is still on course. The constant negative feedback I get, keeps me on my toes.

    Thanx for another informative post.


  • Earth Lee

    I agree that feeling security can lead into danger.

    i love traveling around by bicycle with my club, one time they introduce me a new country route. the first time i run the route very careful, its because the route is so challenging. second time, i got the feel that i’ve already know every turn and slope, then at one slope i got my speed to fast then loosing control of my bike, i hit some logs. afterthat accident i got some trauma whenever i’m going into a slope that keep me inside of carefulness.

    P.s: sorry for my bad english, i’m from indonesia and i’m bad in grammar things 🙂

  • mark

    Great article

    “…still convince[d] it’s”
    (2nd to last paragraph)

  • pam

    i love the way you write 😉 thanks